Buried in section 85 of the Succession Act is a rule that rewrites estates while nobody watches: marriage revokes a prior will — automatically, silently, at the ceremony — unless the will was made in contemplation of that marriage. No warning attaches, no formality intervenes, and families discover it decades later, standing over an estate governed by a document that legally died at a wedding.
The Rule and Its One Exception
The mechanism is total: the subsequent marriage (or civil partnership) revokes the will, and unless a new will followed, the estate passes on intestacy’s fixed map — with its spousal shares pointing much of everything at the new spouse. The exception: a will made in contemplation of the particular marriage survives it — cleanest where the document says so on its face, arguable from circumstances where it doesn’t, and exactly the analysis a specialist read settles. The asymmetry completes the trap: divorce and separation revoke nothing — marriage kills wills silently, endings preserve them silently, and the law tells nobody either way.
The Estates It Catches
The recurring casualties: the later-life marriage — the decades-old will favouring first-family children dies at the second wedding, and intestacy redirects the estate toward the new spouse, converting the blended-family collision from managed to maximal; and the long-engaged couple whose “sorted years ago” wills predate the eventual ceremony that revoked them both. For anyone examining an estate now, the discipline is mechanical: will date against marriage date, first — because if the will fell, every entitlement in the room recalculates: the spouse’s intestate share, children’s fixed portions, and the section 117 landscape all replace the dead document’s promises.
Issue One, Before Positions Form
This analysis reverses family expectations regularly — in both directions: the children relying on a revoked will, and equally the spouse unaware intestacy now favours them. It belongs at the very start, before anyone entrenches around a document that may be legally dead: the dates compared, the contemplation exception tested, the consequences mapped. One reading, one conversation — and everything after proceeds on the estate’s real legal footing. The formalities family this rule belongs to: invalid & lost wills.
Did a Marriage Follow the Will?
Then that question comes before every other one - and it takes one specialist read to answer. Bring the dates; the analysis is quick and it changes everything.
Call 01 5827148Related Reading
Marriage & Revocation - FAQs
About the Author
Richard O’Shea, Solicitor, TEP practises with Mary Molloy Solicitors (established 1981) in probate, will disputes and estate litigation throughout Ireland. Richard is a qualified Trust and Estate Practitioner (STEP) — the international specialist credential for wills, trusts and estates — and holds a Diploma in Mediation from the Law Society of Ireland, a pairing built for exactly this work: specialist estates expertise, and the means to keep families out of war where that is still possible. Contact Richard on 01 5827148 or richardoshea@marymolloysolicitors.com.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Every estate and family situation is different, and time limits in this area are strictly applied - obtain advice on your own circumstances before acting or deciding not to act. We do not advise on tax; taxation questions should be directed to your accountant and Revenue’s published guidance. In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement.